Far-right tech investor Peter Thiel recently sat down with The New York Times columnist Ross Douthat to discuss a wide range of subjects—from politics and religion to the future of humanity. While the media focused on the interview’s sensational “Antichrist” angle, Thiel’s commentary on Elon Musk, his longtime associate, offered perhaps the most thought-provoking insights—particularly for anyone observing the intersection of technology, capitalism, and ideology.
Read More: CDC Slide Deck Allegedly Cites Fake Study on Vaccine Risks
Questioning Musk’s Beliefs on Robotics
One of the most striking takeaways from the interview came when Thiel cast doubt on whether Musk fully believes in the robotic future he’s promoting. Musk, who has been pushing the narrative of a personal humanoid robot in every home since 2021, envisions a U.S. populated by a billion robots within a decade. His company Tesla even unveiled the “Optimus” robot—although its early reveals were little more than theatrical demonstrations.
However, Thiel highlighted a major contradiction: Musk’s political fixation on budget deficits doesn’t align with his supposed belief in this coming era of massive productivity.
“If you’re going to have a billion humanoid robots,” Thiel told The Times, “you don’t need to worry about budget deficits. Growth will take care of everything.”
Thiel suggested that Musk either hasn’t thought the robot revolution through, or he doesn’t actually believe in the scale and impact he publicly touts.
The Economic Fantasy Behind the Machines
The idea that automation would usher in a golden age of human leisure isn’t new. Throughout the 20th century, technologists predicted drastically reduced workweeks and abundant prosperity through automation. Musk has echoed those utopian predictions—touting ideas like universal basic income (UBI) and a post-labor economy.
But in practice, Musk’s politics contradict that vision. He has aggressively supported policies that undermine the very concept of UBI and safety nets for displaced workers. Instead, Musk has funded right-wing causes, invested heavily in Donald Trump’s 2024 campaign, and used his influence to marginalize communities such as immigrants and trans people.
This contradiction is central to Thiel’s critique: If Musk truly believed in the productivity explosion he’s selling, he should embrace an economic system that redistributes that wealth. But so far, his politics reflect a status-quo protection of elite capital, not its transformation.
The All-In Bros and Silicon Valley’s Growth Delusion
Thiel’s argument isn’t an isolated one in Silicon Valley. Musk’s allies—like the hosts of the All-In Podcast—often make similar claims: that economic growth from AI and robotics will solve fiscal problems like the national deficit. Yet these same figures continue to support massive tax cuts for the wealthy, such as Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill,” which the Congressional Budget Office projects will increase the deficit by $2.4 trillion.
In essence, these technocrats want it both ways: growth-driven optimism to justify deregulation and tax cuts, paired with deficit hysteria to oppose social programs. Thiel stands apart slightly in that he at least acknowledges the logical inconsistencies.
Optimus: A Work-in-Progress Robot, or PR Stunt?
Tesla’s humanoid robot Optimus remains a spectacle rather than a technical marvel. Despite Musk’s claims that it’s capable of performing household tasks, demonstrations have shown the robot operating under human control, not autonomously. A video of Optimus folding laundry posted in January 2024 turned out to be smoke and mirrors—complete with a human hand sneaking into frame to assist.
Meanwhile, competitors like Boston Dynamics have been showcasing advanced bipedal robots performing complex maneuvers for years. Musk is playing catch-up, and critics argue that Optimus is more about stock valuations and public image than real progress in AI robotics.
Mars, Seasteading, and Abandoned Political Fantasies
Thiel also addressed Musk’s spacefaring ambitions, suggesting Musk has grown cynical about even his most radical dreams. In their past conversations, Thiel recounted suggesting seasteading—a plan to create libertarian island nations—as a political escape plan. Musk reportedly dismissed the idea with the bleak reply: “There’s nowhere to go.”
This led Thiel to conclude that 2024 was the year Musk stopped believing in Mars—at least as a political experiment. The vision of Mars as a libertarian haven free from earthly regulation has been replaced by the fear that even on Mars, “the woke AI and socialist U.S. government would follow you.”
This pivot reflects a broader truth about Musk’s worldview. His early visions were driven by libertarian idealism and technological optimism. But today, those dreams are either on hold or rendered politically incoherent.
A Tech Utopia Built on a Broken Foundation?
Thiel, for all his extreme views—including opposing women’s suffrage—may at least grasp the implications of the future he’s advocating for. Musk, by contrast, appears trapped between the sci-fi idealism of the 20th century and the regressive politics of today.
As Thiel put it, Musk’s politics haven’t evolved to match the future he claims to be building. Whether that future includes robots, Mars colonies, or universal leisure, it would require a fundamentally different political and economic structure—one Musk appears unwilling to support.
Frequently Asked Questions
What did Peter Thiel say about Elon Musk’s robot revolution?
Peter Thiel suggested that Elon Musk either doesn’t fully believe in his own predictions about humanoid robots or hasn’t thought through the broader economic and political consequences of such a future.
Why does Thiel think Musk’s vision is flawed?
Thiel argues that if Musk truly believed robots would revolutionize productivity, he wouldn’t be so concerned about issues like national debt, because economic growth would resolve those problems naturally.
What is Musk’s stance on humanoid robots?
Elon Musk predicts there will be a billion humanoid robots in the U.S. within 10 years, and he envisions a future where robots handle most labor, leading to a post-work society.
What is Tesla’s robot Optimus, and how advanced is it?
Tesla’s Optimus robot is still in early development and currently relies on tele-operation. Critics, including Thiel, argue that it’s more publicity stunt than breakthrough.
How does politics factor into Thiel’s critique of Musk?
Thiel points out the contradiction between Musk’s support for fiscal conservatism and right-wing politics and his predictions of a high-tech, post-labor society. The economic models behind such a future would demand progressive redistribution policies Musk does not support.
Does Thiel support Musk’s ambitions for Mars?
Thiel suggests that Musk has lost faith in Mars as a political escape or libertarian utopia, noting that in 2024, Musk admitted there’s “nowhere to go”—not even outer space.
Is Thiel being critical or supportive of Musk?
While Thiel remains intellectually engaged with Musk’s ideas, his remarks are largely critical—calling out inconsistencies and questioning whether Musk truly understands the societal impact of his own innovations.
Conclusion
Peter Thiel’s critique of Elon Musk is less about technical skepticism and more about philosophical inconsistency. Musk talks about a post-work world powered by intelligent machines but refuses to back the policies that would make such a world livable for the majority. He dreams of Mars but has seemingly abandoned it as a serious political alternative.
